
Matthew is the Gospel writer who gives us the royal lineage of Joseph, directly descended from the original kings of Israel, David and his son Solomon. He claims to be an eye-witness of these events and pronounces Jesus as the expected Jewish Messiah. He also seems to be big on the Virgin birth from a prophecy of Isaiah, but probably related to the curse on Jeconiah recorded in Jeremiah 22.
In April 1996 a book was published by the name of "Eyewitness to Jesus: Amazing New Manuscript Evidence About the Origin of the Gospels" by Thiede and D'Ancona.
The book claims that three ancient papyrus fragments, known as the Magdalen Papyrus, corroborate the tradition that St. Matthew actually wrote the Gospel bearing his name, that he wrote it within a generation of Jesus' death, and that the Gospel stories about Jesus are true.
Causing questions: Why are there three other Gospels, with Mark traditionally seen as the earliest one? Who is the mysterious Q source for the words of Jesus? How does Matthew treat this material differently than the other three accounts?
In April 1996 a book was published by the name of "Eyewitness to Jesus: Amazing New Manuscript Evidence About the Origin of the Gospels" by Thiede and D'Ancona.
The book claims that three ancient papyrus fragments, known as the Magdalen Papyrus, corroborate the tradition that St. Matthew actually wrote the Gospel bearing his name, that he wrote it within a generation of Jesus' death, and that the Gospel stories about Jesus are true.
Causing questions: Why are there three other Gospels, with Mark traditionally seen as the earliest one? Who is the mysterious Q source for the words of Jesus? How does Matthew treat this material differently than the other three accounts?
